Giving Young People a Voice: Our Submission on Votes at 16
By Serena Kelly
As the UK edges closer to the prospect of votes at 16, one question becomes impossible to ignore: are young people actually being prepared to participate in our democracy?
I Have a Voice (IHAV) is a social enterprise working with young people who are under-represented in politics, including those from low‑income households, racially minoritised groups and young people with disabilities. Through political literacy programmes, peer‑education initiatives and youth‑led social action, we see every day both the power of democratic education in schools and the gaps that remain.
Our 2023 survey of 124 young people found that only about 1 in 5 felt school had equipped them with the tools and knowledge to be politically literate. Among state school students, 65% disagreed that they had been given these tools, compared with 25% of students in private schools – a clear sign of unequal provision.
This pattern is echoed in wider research. Dr James Weinberg’s 2020 study found that just 29% of students received regular, whole lessons in politics or citizenship education, with stronger provision concentrated in more affluent and fee‑paying schools. At the same time, the Electoral Commission’s Young Voices on Democracy 2025 report shows that 72% of young people think most of their peers actually want to learn more about politics in school.
So there is both a demand and a provision gap.
Young people consistently tell us they want to understand how voting works (including alternative systems), what devolved governments do, what MPs and local councils are responsible for, and how to critically evaluate information. They are not asking to be told what to think. They want tools to navigate democracy confidently and independently.
Peer‑led education has been one of the most effective ways we’ve found to meet this need. Through programmes such as our Voter Ambassador scheme, we train young people to co‑create resources and facilitate sessions for their peers. In a recent project with the Electoral Commission:
87% of participants said they knew more about registering to vote and elections after a peer‑led workshop.
89% said they now plan to vote as soon as they can and feel more confident about fact‑checking and finding reliable information.
Participants tell us that learning from someone their own age makes politics feel more relatable and less intimidating. It helps normalise the idea that not only can young people participate, but they should. However, this kind of work only thrives when schools provide supportive staff, protected time in the timetable and clear structures.
Overall, our evidence suggests that democratic education works best when it is sustained, youth‑led and embedded in a school’s culture. To prepare all young people for votes at 16, we recommend that schools:
Treat political education as a core entitlement, not an occasional add‑on.
Create recognised student roles (for example, Democracy or Voter Ambassadors) with training, time and staff support to run activities on voting, rights and social action throughout the year.
Model democratic practice in everyday school life, through meaningful student voice structures and, where possible, student representation in governance.
Young people are clear: they want to understand how democracy works and how to influence decisions. With the right support and expectations, schools can play a central role in ensuring that, by the time voting at 16 is introduced, young people feel informed, empowered and ready to take part in democratic life.
Click here to read our full submission.



Para quienes investigan magistv, creo que es importante comprobar siempre la información antes de instalar una aplicación. Revisar la fuente y los permisos puede evitar riesgos innecesarios. También conviene mantener actualizado el dispositivo, ya que la seguridad depende de varios factores y no solamente del software utilizado.
When you're weighing up multiple platforms, the first thing I'd check is how easy it is to find what you're looking for. If the site feels cluttered or the menus are confusing, it's probably not worth your time. 666 Casino stood out to me because it doesn't try to overcomplicate things — the design is clean and the information is accessible without digging through layers of pages. I'd still do my own research before making any calls, but it's definitely one of the more straightforward options I've come across lately.
That 65% stat comparing state school students feeling unprepared politically to just 25% in private schools really highlights the gap. It is staggering how early structural inequality shapes civic engagement. Reminds me of studying institutional dynamics while doing Game Theory Assignment help from New Assignment Help Experts – strategic access to information completely changes how participants interact within any system. I wonder if mandating a standardized citizenship curriculum across all schools would actually bridge that confidence gap, or if it really takes peer-led ambassador programs to make the material feel relevant to young people? Really thoughtful piece!
If you’re comparing gaming clubs in the UK, I’d start with the less exciting information and work from there. Clear terms, understandable account rules, payment options and accessible support give you a much better idea of what to expect. Casino Santander is one option I’d look into alongside several alternatives. I’d still verify the current conditions before making a decision, but having it on the comparison list seems reasonable if you’re researching different UK options.
This is such an important submission — the gap between private and state schools when it comes to political education is striking, and it's great to see IHAV addressing that head-on with peer-led programmes. Young people clearly want to understand how democracy works, they're just not always given the tools, and if you're interested in reading the full submission or seeing more of their research, spinking has the complete document and additional resources worth checking out. The Voter Ambassador scheme sounds like exactly the kind of hands-on approach that actually sticks.